Co-Pilot
Updated 24 days ago

content

Ppauljbernard
0.0k
pauljbernard/content
84
Agent Score

πŸ’‘ Summary

A hierarchical knowledge system for creating reusable, standards-aligned educational content across various subjects and states.

🎯 Target Audience

Curriculum DevelopersEducational Content AuthorsSchool District AdministratorsTeachers in K-8 EducationEducational Technology Integrators

πŸ€– AI Roast: β€œThis system is like a Swiss Army knife for educators, but I hope they don't lose it in the classroom chaos.”

Security AnalysisMedium Risk

The README does not indicate any direct security risks, but the system's complexity could lead to misconfigurations. Ensure proper access controls and regular audits to mitigate risks.

Content Repository

Multi-Curriculum Educational Content Development System

This repository provides:

  1. HMH Multi-Curriculum Knowledge Base - A hierarchical, reusable knowledge system for creating standards-aligned instructional materials across any state, any subject, any grade level
  2. Professor Framework Integration - AI-powered content development with 92 specialized skills and 22 autonomous agents

Table of Contents


HMH Multi-Curriculum Knowledge Base

Status: Week 3 Complete (50 files, 94% of Phase 1)

What It Is

A hierarchical knowledge resolution system that enables creating standards-aligned, state-compliant instructional materials with 85-97% knowledge reuse across curricula.

Key Innovation: Write once, reuse everywhere. Universal instructional frameworks, assessment guides, and accessibility standards are shared across all states and subjects. State-specific standards and compliance requirements are layered on top through a 5-level hierarchy.

Current Coverage

States: 3 of 51 (6%)

  • Texas (TEKS standards)
  • California (CCSS/NGSS standards)
  • Florida (MAFS/B.E.S.T./NGSSS standards)

Subjects: 3 of 10+ core subjects (30%)

  • Mathematics (K-8) - 8 Math Language Routines, TEKS/CCSS-M/MAFS alignment
  • ELA (K-8) - 4 Literacy Routines, TEKS ELA/CCSS ELA alignment
  • Science (K-8) - NGSS 3-dimensional learning, 8 Science & Engineering Practices

Grade Levels: K-8 (elementary and middle school)

Curricula Supported:

  • HMH Into Math Texas Edition
  • HMH Into Math California Edition
  • HMH Into Math Florida Edition
  • HMH Into Reading Texas Edition

Knowledge Reuse Demonstrated

  • Florida Math: 97% reuse (only 1 new file, 30 files reused)
  • California Math: 93% reuse (2 new files, 28 files reused)
  • Texas ELA: 90% reuse (3 new files, 27 files reused)

Comparison to Traditional Approach:

  • Traditional: ~500-750 unique files per curriculum (no reuse)
  • This System: 50 shared files support 4 curricula (98% file reduction)

Architecture

5-Level Hierarchical Resolution (specific β†’ general, first match wins):

1. Program-Specific       (e.g., Into Math TX specific features)
   ↓ (if not found)
2. Subject-District       (e.g., TEKS Math alignment)
   ↓ (if not found)
3. Subject-Common         (e.g., Math MLRs, universal for all states)
   ↓ (if not found)
4. District-Wide          (e.g., Texas compliance, ELPS)
   ↓ (if not found)
5. Universal              (e.g., UDL, DOK, WCAG, assessment best practices)

Example Resolution for "How to scaffold vocabulary for emergent bilinguals in Texas Math":

  1. Checks /subjects/mathematics/districts/texas/into-math/ (program-specific)
  2. Checks /subjects/mathematics/districts/texas/ (TEKS math)
  3. βœ… Finds /subjects/mathematics/common/mlr/ (Math Language Routines - universal)
  4. βœ… Finds /districts/texas/language/elps-alignment.md (Texas language standards)
  5. βœ… Finds /universal/frameworks/eb-scaffolding-guide.md (universal EB support)

Result: Combines universal MLR strategies with Texas-specific ELPS requirements and universal EB scaffolding techniques.

Directory Structure

reference/hmh-knowledge-v2/
β”œβ”€β”€ universal/                    # 15 files - applies to ALL curricula
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ frameworks/               # UDL, DOK, EB scaffolding, sentence frames
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ assessment/               # Item types, rubrics, answer keys (8 files)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ accessibility/            # WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ content-equity/           # CEID bias-free content standards
β”‚   └── vendor/                   # HMH-specific quality checklists
β”œβ”€β”€ subjects/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ mathematics/
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ common/               # 12 files - ALL states use these
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ mlr/              # 8 Math Language Routines (MLR1-MLR8)
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ vocab-guidelines.md
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   └── problem-solving-framework.md
β”‚   β”‚   └── districts/
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ texas/            # TEKS Math alignment
β”‚   β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ california/       # CCSS-M alignment
β”‚   β”‚       └── florida/          # MAFS alignment
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ ela/
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ common/               # 5 files - ALL states use these
β”‚   β”‚   β”‚   └── literacy-routines/  # Close Reading, Think-Pair-Share, etc.
β”‚   β”‚   └── districts/
β”‚   β”‚       └── texas/            # TEKS ELA alignment
β”‚   └── science/
β”‚       └── common/               # 2 files - ALL NGSS states use these
β”‚           β”œβ”€β”€ ngss-alignment-guide.md
β”‚           └── science-practices-framework.md
β”œβ”€β”€ districts/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ texas/                    # 4 files - applies to ALL subjects in TX
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ compliance/           # SBOE, IPACC requirements
β”‚   β”‚   └── language/             # ELPS (Texas language standards)
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ california/               # 2 files - applies to ALL subjects in CA
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ compliance/           # CA adoption criteria
β”‚   β”‚   └── language/             # ELD Standards
β”‚   └── florida/                  # 3 files - applies to ALL subjects in FL
β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ compliance/           # FL statutory compliance
β”‚       └── language/             # ESOL/WIDA Standards
└── publishers/
    └── hmh/                      # HMH content schema

config/curriculum/
β”œβ”€β”€ hmh-math-tx.json              # Defines resolution order for TX Math
β”œβ”€β”€ hmh-math-ca.json              # Defines resolution order for CA Math
β”œβ”€β”€ hmh-math-fl.json              # Defines resolution order for FL Math
└── hmh-ela-tx.json               # Defines resolution order for TX ELA

Key Files by Category

Universal (15 files) - Reused by ALL Curricula:

  • UDL Principles Guide
  • DOK (Depth of Knowledge) Framework
  • EB Scaffolding Guide (Emergent Bilinguals)
  • Sentence Frames Library
  • WCAG 2.1 AA Compliance Guide
  • 8 Assessment Files (item types, rubrics, answer keys, validation, etc.)
  • CEID Guidelines (Content Equity, Inclusion & Diversity)
  • Vendor Quality Checklist

Mathematics Common (12 files) - Reused by ALL Math Programs:

  • 8 Math Language Routines (MLR1-MLR8):
    • MLR1: Stronger and Clearer Each Time
    • MLR2: Collect and Display
    • MLR3: Critique, Correct, and Clarify
    • MLR4: Information Gap
    • MLR5: Co-Craft Questions
    • MLR6: Three Reads
    • MLR7: Compare and Connect
    • MLR8: Discussion Supports
  • MLR Overview & Placement Rules
  • Math Vocabulary Guidelines
  • Problem-Solving Framework

ELA Common (5 files) - Reused by ALL ELA Programs:

  • Close Reading Protocol
  • Think-Pair-Share
  • Annotation Protocol
  • Turn-and-Talk
  • (More literacy routines to be added)

Science Common (2 files) - Reused by ALL NGSS States:

  • NGSS Alignment Guide (3-dimensional learning)
  • Science Practices Framework (8 SEPs with CER framework)

State-District Files (9 files) - Apply to ALL subjects in that state:

  • Texas: IPACC, SBOE, ELPS, compliance checklist
  • California: Adoption criteria, ELD Standards
  • Florida: Adoption criteria, ESOL/WIDA, statutory compliance

Subject-District Files (7 files) - State + Subject specific:

  • TEKS Math alignment (TX)
  • TEKS ELA alignment (TX)
  • CCSS-M alignment (CA)
  • MAFS alignment (FL)
  • Gap mitigation strategies (TX Math)
  • (ELA CA/FL and Science files - documented gaps)

Documentation: Complete Guide Suite

The system provides 4 specialized guides for different roles:

πŸ“ AUTHOR_GUIDE.md - For Content Authors

  • Complete authoring workflows (lessons, assessments, activities)
  • Using the knowledge base to generate content
  • AI assistance with Professor Framework
  • Quality standards and checklists
  • 850 lines of comprehensive guidance

βœ… EDITOR_GUIDE.md - For Content Editors

  • Editorial workflow from assignment to approval
  • 8-section comprehensive review checklist
  • Effective feedback templates
  • Common issues and fixes
  • 450 lines of editorial guidance

πŸ“¦ PRODUCTION_GUIDE.md - For Publishers/Production

  • Multi-format production (PDF, HTML, SCORM, accessible)
  • Asset management and optimization
  • QA checklists and delivery workflows
  • 450 lines of production guidance

βš™οΈ ENGINEER_GUIDE.md - For Knowledge Base Engineers

  • System architecture and hierarchical resolution
  • Adding new states/districts (2-6 files, 85-97% reuse)
  • Adding new subjects (8-15 files)
  • Creating curriculum configs
  • File creation best practices and templates
  • 1700 lines of engineering documentation

πŸ“‹ USER_GUIDE.md - Overview and Navigation

  • Introduction to the 4 guides
  • Quick navigation by role
  • Complete content lifecycle
  • Documentation roadmap

For Engineers: How to Use This System

See: ENGINEER_GUIDE.md - Complete guide for knowledge base engineers

Quick Start:

  1. Choose or create a curriculum config (see config/curriculum/)
  2. Config defines resolution order (program β†’ subject-district β†’ subject-common β†’ district β†’ universal)
  3. System automatically finds and combines relevant knowledge files
  4. Generate content using combined knowledge with 85-97% reuse

Adding New States:

  • CCSS/NGSS state: 2-3 files (compliance, language, notes) β†’ 90-95% reuse
  • State-specific standards: 5-6 files (standards per subject + compliance) β†’ 85-90% reuse

Adding New Subjects:

  • 8-10 subject-common files (instructional routines, standards alignment)
  • 1-2 subject-district files per state
  • Reuse all 15 universal files and all district-wide files

Future Expansion Roadmap

See: .archive/HMH_Scaling_Roadmap_National_All_Subjects.md

Phase 2-7: Complete national coverage

  • Add 48 more states/districts (total: 51)
  • Add 7+ core subjects (Social
5-Dim Analysis
Clarity8/10
Novelty9/10
Utility9/10
Completeness8/10
Maintainability8/10
Pros & Cons

Pros

  • High knowledge reuse across curricula
  • Supports multiple states and subjects
  • AI-powered content development
  • Comprehensive documentation for users

Cons

  • Limited current state coverage
  • Complexity in hierarchical structure
  • Requires significant initial setup
  • Potential learning curve for new users

Related Skills

pytorch

S
toolCode Lib
92/ 100

β€œIt's the Swiss Army knife of deep learning, but good luck figuring out which of the 47 installation methods is the one that won't break your system.”

agno

S
toolCode Lib
90/ 100

β€œIt promises to be the Kubernetes for agents, but let's see if developers have the patience to learn yet another orchestration layer.”

nuxt-skills

S
toolCo-Pilot
90/ 100

β€œIt's essentially a well-organized cheat sheet that turns your AI assistant into a Nuxt framework parrot.”

Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.

Copyright belongs to the original author pauljbernard.