Co-Pilot
Updated a day ago

finishing-a-development-branch

Oobra
28.1k
obra/superpowers/skills/finishing-a-development-branch
78
Agent Score

💡 Summary

A structured workflow skill that guides an AI agent through verifying tests and executing a user's choice for completing a development branch (merge, PR, keep, or discard).

🎯 Target Audience

Junior developers using AI assistantsDevelopment team leads automating workflowsAI agent developers building coding skillsDevOps engineers seeking reproducible processes

🤖 AI Roast:It's a glorified checklist for Git, giving your AI agent the illusion of being a responsible senior developer.

Security AnalysisLow Risk

The skill instructs the agent to execute shell commands (git, test suites) and potentially delete branches/worktrees. This poses a risk of destructive actions if the agent misinterprets context or state. Mitigation: The agent framework should sandbox or heavily audit any skill that triggers shell execution.


name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

# Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
5-Dim Analysis
Clarity8/10
Novelty5/10
Utility9/10
Completeness9/10
Maintainability8/10
Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Provides a clear, step-by-step guardrail for a critical workflow.
  • Enforces safety checks like test verification and discard confirmation.
  • Integrates well with other skills like git worktrees and subagent development.

Cons

  • Very prescriptive; may not fit all Git or team workflows.
  • Relies on the agent correctly executing shell commands, which is a risk.
  • Novelty is low; it automates a common, well-understood process.

Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.

Copyright belongs to the original author obra.

finishing-a-development-branch