finishing-a-development-branch
💡 Summary
A structured workflow skill that guides an AI agent through verifying tests and executing a user's choice for completing a development branch (merge, PR, keep, or discard).
🎯 Target Audience
🤖 AI Roast: “It's a glorified checklist for Git, giving your AI agent the illusion of being a responsible senior developer.”
The skill instructs the agent to execute shell commands (git, test suites) and potentially delete branches/worktrees. This poses a risk of destructive actions if the agent misinterprets context or state. Mitigation: The agent framework should sandbox or heavily audit any skill that triggers shell execution.
name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation - keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )"
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."
Don't cleanup worktree.
Option 4: Discard
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Step 5: Cleanup Worktree
For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in worktree:
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)
If yes:
git worktree remove <worktree-path>
For Option 3: Keep worktree.
Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |
Common Mistakes
Skipping test verification
- Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
- Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions
- Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
- Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options
Automatic worktree cleanup
- Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
- Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discard
- Problem: Accidentally delete work
- Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation
Red Flags
Never:
- Proceed with failing tests
- Merge without verifying tests on result
- Delete work without confirmation
- Force-push without explicit request
Always:
- Verify tests before offering options
- Present exactly 4 options
- Get typed confirmation for Option 4
- Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
Integration
Called by:
- subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
- executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete
Pairs with:
- using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
Pros
- Provides a clear, step-by-step guardrail for a critical workflow.
- Enforces safety checks like test verification and discard confirmation.
- Integrates well with other skills like git worktrees and subagent development.
Cons
- Very prescriptive; may not fit all Git or team workflows.
- Relies on the agent correctly executing shell commands, which is a risk.
- Novelty is low; it automates a common, well-understood process.
Related Skills
pytorch
S“It's the Swiss Army knife of deep learning, but good luck figuring out which of the 47 installation methods is the one that won't break your system.”
agno
S“It promises to be the Kubernetes for agents, but let's see if developers have the patience to learn yet another orchestration layer.”
nuxt-skills
S“It's essentially a well-organized cheat sheet that turns your AI assistant into a Nuxt framework parrot.”
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.
Copyright belongs to the original author obra.
