spec-to-code-compliance
💡 Summary
This skill checks code compliance against specifications for blockchain audits, ensuring alignment and identifying gaps.
🎯 Target Audience
🤖 AI Roast: “Powerful, but the setup might scare off the impatient.”
Risk: Medium. Review: filesystem read/write scope and path traversal. Run with least privilege and audit before enabling in production.
Spec-to-Code Compliance
Specification-to-code compliance checker for blockchain audits with evidence-based alignment analysis.
Author: Omar Inuwa
When to Use
Use this skill when you need to:
- Verify that code implements exactly what documentation specifies
- Find gaps between intended behavior and actual implementation
- Audit smart contracts against whitepapers or design documents
- Identify undocumented code behavior or unimplemented spec claims
What It Does
This skill performs deterministic, evidence-based alignment between specifications and code:
- Documentation Discovery - Finds all spec sources (whitepapers, READMEs, design notes)
- Spec Intent Extraction - Normalizes all intended behavior into structured format
- Code Behavior Analysis - Line-by-line semantic analysis of actual implementation
- Alignment Comparison - Maps spec items to code with match types and confidence scores
- Divergence Classification - Categorizes misalignments by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
Key Principle
Zero speculation. Every claim must be backed by:
- Exact quotes from documentation (section/title)
- Specific code references (file + line numbers)
- Confidence scores (0-1) for all mappings
Installation
/plugin install trailofbits/skills/plugins/spec-to-code-compliance
Phases
- Documentation Discovery - Identify all spec sources
- Format Normalization - Create clean spec corpus
- Spec Intent IR - Extract all intended behavior
- Code Behavior IR - Line-by-line code analysis
- Alignment IR - Compare spec to code
- Divergence Classification - Categorize misalignments
- Final Report - Generate audit-grade compliance report
Match Types
full_match- Code exactly implements specpartial_match- Incomplete implementationmismatch- Spec says X, code does Ymissing_in_code- Spec claim not implementedcode_stronger_than_spec- Code adds behaviorcode_weaker_than_spec- Code misses requirements
Anti-Hallucination Rules
- If spec is silent: classify as UNDOCUMENTED
- If code adds behavior: classify as UNDOCUMENTED CODE PATH
- If unclear: classify as AMBIGUOUS
- Every claim must quote original text or line numbers
Related Skills
context-building- Deep code understandingissue-writer- Format compliance gaps as findings
Pros
- Provides detailed compliance analysis
- Identifies gaps between spec and code
- Supports multiple documentation formats
Cons
- May require extensive documentation
- Complexity in setup for large projects
- Can be time-consuming for large codebases
Related Skills
building-secure-contracts
A“Powerful, but the setup might scare off the impatient.”
entry-point-analyzer
A“Powerful, but the setup might scare off the impatient.”
phantom-connect-skill
A“Powerful, but the setup might scare off the impatient.”
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.
Copyright belongs to the original author trailofbits.
