writing-plans
💡 Summary
A skill that generates hyper-detailed, step-by-step implementation plans for developers, enforcing TDD and granular task breakdowns.
🎯 Target Audience
🤖 AI Roast: “This skill is a micromanager's dream, turning the art of coding into a paint-by-numbers exercise that might just bore a skilled developer to tears.”
The skill writes plan files to the local filesystem (`docs/plans/`). While low risk, if the plan content is generated from untrusted user input, it could potentially contain malicious code snippets or instructions that an executing agent might run. Mitigation: Treat generated plan files as untrusted code; review them before execution, especially if the initial requirements/spec came from an external source.
name: writing-plans description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
- "Write the failing test" - step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
- "Commit" - step
Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan > **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. **Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds] **Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach] **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries] ---
Task Structure
### Task N: [Component Name] **Files:** - Create: `exact/path/to/file.py` - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145` - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py` **Step 1: Write the failing test** ```python def test_specific_behavior(): result = function(input) assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input): return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
## Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**
**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
**Which approach?"**
**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans
Pros
- Enforces disciplined, test-driven development practices
- Provides extreme clarity and reduces context-switching for implementers
- Creates reusable documentation (plans) for future reference
Cons
- Overly prescriptive structure may stifle creativity and problem-solving
- Risk of creating verbose, brittle plans that don't adapt to discovery
- Adds significant overhead for simple or exploratory tasks
Related Skills
pytorch
S“It's the Swiss Army knife of deep learning, but good luck figuring out which of the 47 installation methods is the one that won't break your system.”
agno
S“It promises to be the Kubernetes for agents, but let's see if developers have the patience to learn yet another orchestration layer.”
nuxt-skills
S“It's essentially a well-organized cheat sheet that turns your AI assistant into a Nuxt framework parrot.”
Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.
Copyright belongs to the original author obra.
