Co-Pilot
Updated a day ago

writing-plans

Oobra
28.1k
obra/superpowers/skills/writing-plans
78
Agent Score

💡 Summary

A skill that generates hyper-detailed, step-by-step implementation plans for developers, enforcing TDD and granular task breakdowns.

🎯 Target Audience

Junior developers needing structured guidanceTechnical leads creating implementation blueprints for teamsSolo developers working on complex, unfamiliar codebasesEducators teaching software engineering workflows

🤖 AI Roast:This skill is a micromanager's dream, turning the art of coding into a paint-by-numbers exercise that might just bore a skilled developer to tears.

Security AnalysisLow Risk

The skill writes plan files to the local filesystem (`docs/plans/`). While low risk, if the plan content is generated from untrusted user input, it could potentially contain malicious code snippets or instructions that an executing agent might run. Mitigation: Treat generated plan files as untrusted code; review them before execution, especially if the initial requirements/spec came from an external source.


name: writing-plans description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Writing Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).

Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):

  • "Write the failing test" - step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
  • "Commit" - step

Plan Document Header

Every plan MUST start with this header:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan > **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. **Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds] **Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach] **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries] ---

Task Structure

### Task N: [Component Name] **Files:** - Create: `exact/path/to/file.py` - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145` - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py` **Step 1: Write the failing test** ```python def test_specific_behavior(): result = function(input) assert result == expected

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

def function(input): return expected

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v Expected: PASS

Step 5: Commit

git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"

## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

## Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, offer execution choice:

**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**

**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints

**Which approach?"**

**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review

**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans
5-Dim Analysis
Clarity8/10
Novelty6/10
Utility9/10
Completeness9/10
Maintainability7/10
Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Enforces disciplined, test-driven development practices
  • Provides extreme clarity and reduces context-switching for implementers
  • Creates reusable documentation (plans) for future reference

Cons

  • Overly prescriptive structure may stifle creativity and problem-solving
  • Risk of creating verbose, brittle plans that don't adapt to discovery
  • Adds significant overhead for simple or exploratory tasks

Disclaimer: This content is sourced from GitHub open source projects for display and rating purposes only.

Copyright belongs to the original author obra.

writing-plans