💡 摘要
一个分层知识系统,用于创建可重用的、符合标准的教育内容,涵盖各种学科和州。
🎯 适合人群
🤖 AI 吐槽: “这个系统就像教育工作者的瑞士军刀,但我希望他们不要在课堂混乱中丢失它。”
自述文件未指明任何直接的安全风险,但系统的复杂性可能导致配置错误。确保适当的访问控制和定期审计以降低风险。
Content Repository
Multi-Curriculum Educational Content Development System
This repository provides:
- HMH Multi-Curriculum Knowledge Base - A hierarchical, reusable knowledge system for creating standards-aligned instructional materials across any state, any subject, any grade level
- Professor Framework Integration - AI-powered content development with 92 specialized skills and 22 autonomous agents
Table of Contents
- HMH Multi-Curriculum Knowledge Base
- Professor Framework Integration
- Repository Structure
- Getting Started
- Quality Standards
- Support
HMH Multi-Curriculum Knowledge Base
Status: Week 3 Complete (50 files, 94% of Phase 1)
What It Is
A hierarchical knowledge resolution system that enables creating standards-aligned, state-compliant instructional materials with 85-97% knowledge reuse across curricula.
Key Innovation: Write once, reuse everywhere. Universal instructional frameworks, assessment guides, and accessibility standards are shared across all states and subjects. State-specific standards and compliance requirements are layered on top through a 5-level hierarchy.
Current Coverage
States: 3 of 51 (6%)
- Texas (TEKS standards)
- California (CCSS/NGSS standards)
- Florida (MAFS/B.E.S.T./NGSSS standards)
Subjects: 3 of 10+ core subjects (30%)
- Mathematics (K-8) - 8 Math Language Routines, TEKS/CCSS-M/MAFS alignment
- ELA (K-8) - 4 Literacy Routines, TEKS ELA/CCSS ELA alignment
- Science (K-8) - NGSS 3-dimensional learning, 8 Science & Engineering Practices
Grade Levels: K-8 (elementary and middle school)
Curricula Supported:
- HMH Into Math Texas Edition
- HMH Into Math California Edition
- HMH Into Math Florida Edition
- HMH Into Reading Texas Edition
Knowledge Reuse Demonstrated
- Florida Math: 97% reuse (only 1 new file, 30 files reused)
- California Math: 93% reuse (2 new files, 28 files reused)
- Texas ELA: 90% reuse (3 new files, 27 files reused)
Comparison to Traditional Approach:
- Traditional: ~500-750 unique files per curriculum (no reuse)
- This System: 50 shared files support 4 curricula (98% file reduction)
Architecture
5-Level Hierarchical Resolution (specific → general, first match wins):
1. Program-Specific (e.g., Into Math TX specific features)
↓ (if not found)
2. Subject-District (e.g., TEKS Math alignment)
↓ (if not found)
3. Subject-Common (e.g., Math MLRs, universal for all states)
↓ (if not found)
4. District-Wide (e.g., Texas compliance, ELPS)
↓ (if not found)
5. Universal (e.g., UDL, DOK, WCAG, assessment best practices)
Example Resolution for "How to scaffold vocabulary for emergent bilinguals in Texas Math":
- Checks
/subjects/mathematics/districts/texas/into-math/(program-specific) - Checks
/subjects/mathematics/districts/texas/(TEKS math) - ✅ Finds
/subjects/mathematics/common/mlr/(Math Language Routines - universal) - ✅ Finds
/districts/texas/language/elps-alignment.md(Texas language standards) - ✅ Finds
/universal/frameworks/eb-scaffolding-guide.md(universal EB support)
Result: Combines universal MLR strategies with Texas-specific ELPS requirements and universal EB scaffolding techniques.
Directory Structure
reference/hmh-knowledge-v2/
├── universal/ # 15 files - applies to ALL curricula
│ ├── frameworks/ # UDL, DOK, EB scaffolding, sentence frames
│ ├── assessment/ # Item types, rubrics, answer keys (8 files)
│ ├── accessibility/ # WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
│ ├── content-equity/ # CEID bias-free content standards
│ └── vendor/ # HMH-specific quality checklists
├── subjects/
│ ├── mathematics/
│ │ ├── common/ # 12 files - ALL states use these
│ │ │ ├── mlr/ # 8 Math Language Routines (MLR1-MLR8)
│ │ │ ├── vocab-guidelines.md
│ │ │ └── problem-solving-framework.md
│ │ └── districts/
│ │ ├── texas/ # TEKS Math alignment
│ │ ├── california/ # CCSS-M alignment
│ │ └── florida/ # MAFS alignment
│ ├── ela/
│ │ ├── common/ # 5 files - ALL states use these
│ │ │ └── literacy-routines/ # Close Reading, Think-Pair-Share, etc.
│ │ └── districts/
│ │ └── texas/ # TEKS ELA alignment
│ └── science/
│ └── common/ # 2 files - ALL NGSS states use these
│ ├── ngss-alignment-guide.md
│ └── science-practices-framework.md
├── districts/
│ ├── texas/ # 4 files - applies to ALL subjects in TX
│ │ ├── compliance/ # SBOE, IPACC requirements
│ │ └── language/ # ELPS (Texas language standards)
│ ├── california/ # 2 files - applies to ALL subjects in CA
│ │ ├── compliance/ # CA adoption criteria
│ │ └── language/ # ELD Standards
│ └── florida/ # 3 files - applies to ALL subjects in FL
│ ├── compliance/ # FL statutory compliance
│ └── language/ # ESOL/WIDA Standards
└── publishers/
└── hmh/ # HMH content schema
config/curriculum/
├── hmh-math-tx.json # Defines resolution order for TX Math
├── hmh-math-ca.json # Defines resolution order for CA Math
├── hmh-math-fl.json # Defines resolution order for FL Math
└── hmh-ela-tx.json # Defines resolution order for TX ELA
Key Files by Category
Universal (15 files) - Reused by ALL Curricula:
- UDL Principles Guide
- DOK (Depth of Knowledge) Framework
- EB Scaffolding Guide (Emergent Bilinguals)
- Sentence Frames Library
- WCAG 2.1 AA Compliance Guide
- 8 Assessment Files (item types, rubrics, answer keys, validation, etc.)
- CEID Guidelines (Content Equity, Inclusion & Diversity)
- Vendor Quality Checklist
Mathematics Common (12 files) - Reused by ALL Math Programs:
- 8 Math Language Routines (MLR1-MLR8):
- MLR1: Stronger and Clearer Each Time
- MLR2: Collect and Display
- MLR3: Critique, Correct, and Clarify
- MLR4: Information Gap
- MLR5: Co-Craft Questions
- MLR6: Three Reads
- MLR7: Compare and Connect
- MLR8: Discussion Supports
- MLR Overview & Placement Rules
- Math Vocabulary Guidelines
- Problem-Solving Framework
ELA Common (5 files) - Reused by ALL ELA Programs:
- Close Reading Protocol
- Think-Pair-Share
- Annotation Protocol
- Turn-and-Talk
- (More literacy routines to be added)
Science Common (2 files) - Reused by ALL NGSS States:
- NGSS Alignment Guide (3-dimensional learning)
- Science Practices Framework (8 SEPs with CER framework)
State-District Files (9 files) - Apply to ALL subjects in that state:
- Texas: IPACC, SBOE, ELPS, compliance checklist
- California: Adoption criteria, ELD Standards
- Florida: Adoption criteria, ESOL/WIDA, statutory compliance
Subject-District Files (7 files) - State + Subject specific:
- TEKS Math alignment (TX)
- TEKS ELA alignment (TX)
- CCSS-M alignment (CA)
- MAFS alignment (FL)
- Gap mitigation strategies (TX Math)
- (ELA CA/FL and Science files - documented gaps)
Documentation: Complete Guide Suite
The system provides 4 specialized guides for different roles:
📝 AUTHOR_GUIDE.md - For Content Authors
- Complete authoring workflows (lessons, assessments, activities)
- Using the knowledge base to generate content
- AI assistance with Professor Framework
- Quality standards and checklists
- 850 lines of comprehensive guidance
✅ EDITOR_GUIDE.md - For Content Editors
- Editorial workflow from assignment to approval
- 8-section comprehensive review checklist
- Effective feedback templates
- Common issues and fixes
- 450 lines of editorial guidance
📦 PRODUCTION_GUIDE.md - For Publishers/Production
- Multi-format production (PDF, HTML, SCORM, accessible)
- Asset management and optimization
- QA checklists and delivery workflows
- 450 lines of production guidance
⚙️ ENGINEER_GUIDE.md - For Knowledge Base Engineers
- System architecture and hierarchical resolution
- Adding new states/districts (2-6 files, 85-97% reuse)
- Adding new subjects (8-15 files)
- Creating curriculum configs
- File creation best practices and templates
- 1700 lines of engineering documentation
📋 USER_GUIDE.md - Overview and Navigation
- Introduction to the 4 guides
- Quick navigation by role
- Complete content lifecycle
- Documentation roadmap
For Engineers: How to Use This System
See: ENGINEER_GUIDE.md - Complete guide for knowledge base engineers
Quick Start:
- Choose or create a curriculum config (see
config/curriculum/) - Config defines resolution order (program → subject-district → subject-common → district → universal)
- System automatically finds and combines relevant knowledge files
- Generate content using combined knowledge with 85-97% reuse
Adding New States:
- CCSS/NGSS state: 2-3 files (compliance, language, notes) → 90-95% reuse
- State-specific standards: 5-6 files (standards per subject + compliance) → 85-90% reuse
Adding New Subjects:
- 8-10 subject-common files (instructional routines, standards alignment)
- 1-2 subject-district files per state
- Reuse all 15 universal files and all district-wide files
Future Expansion Roadmap
See: .archive/HMH_Scaling_Roadmap_National_All_Subjects.md
Phase 2-7: Complete national coverage
- Add 48 more states/districts (total: 51)
- Add 7+ core subjects (Social
优点
- 跨课程的高知识重用
- 支持多个州和学科
- AI驱动的内容开发
- 为用户提供全面的文档
缺点
- 当前州覆盖有限
- 层次结构复杂
- 需要大量初始设置
- 新用户可能面临学习曲线
相关技能
免责声明:本内容来源于 GitHub 开源项目,仅供展示和评分分析使用。
版权归原作者所有 pauljbernard.
