Co-Pilot / 辅助式
更新于 2 months ago

finishing-a-development-branch

Oobra
28.1k
obra/superpowers/skills/finishing-a-development-branch
78
Agent 评分

💡 摘要

一个结构化的工作流技能,指导AI代理完成测试验证并执行用户选择的开发分支完成操作(合并、创建PR、保留或丢弃)。

🎯 适合人群

使用AI助手的初级开发者希望自动化工作流的开发团队负责人构建编码技能的AI代理开发者寻求可重复流程的DevOps工程师

🤖 AI 吐槽:这不过是一个给Git用的花哨检查清单,让你的AI代理假装自己是个负责任的高级开发。

安全分析低风险

该技能指示代理执行Shell命令(git、测试套件)并可能删除分支/工作树。如果代理误解上下文或状态,将导致破坏性操作的风险。缓解措施:代理框架应对触发Shell执行的技能进行沙箱隔离或严格审计。


name: finishing-a-development-branch description: Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 4: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Switch to base branch git checkout <base-branch> # Pull latest git pull # Merge feature branch git merge <feature-branch> # Verify tests on merged result <test command> # If tests pass git branch -d <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 2: Push and Create PR

# Push branch git push -u origin <feature-branch> # Create PR gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <2-3 bullets of what changed> ## Test Plan - [ ] <verification steps> EOF )"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

git checkout <base-branch> git branch -D <feature-branch>

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

For Options 1, 2, 4:

Check if in worktree:

git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)

If yes:

git worktree remove <worktree-path>

For Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch | |--------|-------|------|---------------|----------------| | 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ | | 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - | | 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - | | 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options

Automatic worktree cleanup

  • Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
五维分析
清晰度8/10
创新性5/10
实用性9/10
完整性9/10
可维护性8/10
优缺点分析

优点

  • 为关键工作流提供了清晰、循序渐进的防护栏。
  • 强制执行安全核查,如测试验证和丢弃确认。
  • 与Git工作树、子代理开发等其他技能集成良好。

缺点

  • 规定性过强,可能不适用于所有Git或团队工作流。
  • 依赖代理正确执行Shell命令,存在风险。
  • 新颖性较低,只是自动化了一个常见且易于理解的过程。

相关技能

pytorch

S
toolCode Lib / 代码库
92/ 100

“它是深度学习的瑞士军刀,但祝你好运能从47种安装方法里找到那个不会搞崩你系统的那一个。”

agno

S
toolCode Lib / 代码库
90/ 100

“它承诺成为智能体领域的Kubernetes,但得看开发者有没有耐心学习又一个编排层。”

nuxt-skills

S
toolCo-Pilot / 辅助式
90/ 100

“这本质上是一份组织良好的小抄,能把你的 AI 助手变成一只 Nuxt 框架的复读机。”

免责声明:本内容来源于 GitHub 开源项目,仅供展示和评分分析使用。

版权归原作者所有 obra.