Co-Pilot / 辅助式
更新于 a month ago

langsmith-fetch

CComposioHQ
21.8k
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills/langsmith-fetch
86
Agent 评分

💡 摘要

一个调试技能,用于从 LangSmith Studio 获取和分析执行轨迹,以诊断 LangChain/LangGraph 智能体的问题。

🎯 适合人群

AI 智能体开发者调试 LangChain 应用的机器学习工程师AI 系统运维人员AI 产品技术支持

🤖 AI 吐槽:这是你 AI 智能体的绝佳调试器,前提是你的智能体犯的第一个错误不是忘了启用追踪。

安全分析中风险

该技能需要 LANGSMITH_API_KEY,这是一个高价值密钥。README 展示了在获取的数据上执行 shell 命令(例如 grep),如果数据不可信,则可能存在风险。缓解措施:确保该技能在沙盒环境中运行,并且绝不评估或执行可能存在于轨迹数据中的代码片段。


name: langsmith-fetch description: Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

LangSmith Fetch - Agent Debugging Skill

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces directly from LangSmith Studio in your terminal.

When to Use This Skill

Automatically activate when user mentions:

  • 🐛 "Debug my agent" or "What went wrong?"
  • 🔍 "Show me recent traces" or "What happened?"
  • ❌ "Check for errors" or "Why did it fail?"
  • 💾 "Analyze memory operations" or "Check LTM"
  • 📊 "Review agent performance" or "Check token usage"
  • 🔧 "What tools were called?" or "Show execution flow"

Prerequisites

1. Install langsmith-fetch

pip install langsmith-fetch

2. Set Environment Variables

export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_langsmith_api_key" export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project_name"

Verify setup:

echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Quick Debug Recent Activity

When user asks: "What just happened?" or "Debug my agent"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty

Analyze and report:

  1. ✅ Number of traces found
  2. ⚠️ Any errors or failures
  3. 🛠️ Tools that were called
  4. ⏱️ Execution times
  5. 💰 Token usage

Example response format:

Found 3 traces in the last 5 minutes:

Trace 1: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: recall_memories, create_entities
- Duration: 2.3s
- Tokens: 1,245

Trace 2: ❌ Error
- Agent: cypher
- Error: "Neo4j connection timeout"
- Duration: 15.1s
- Failed at: search_nodes tool

Trace 3: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: store_memory
- Duration: 1.8s
- Tokens: 892

💡 Issue found: Trace 2 failed due to Neo4j timeout. Recommend checking database connection.

Workflow 2: Deep Dive Specific Trace

When user provides: Trace ID or says "investigate that error"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format json

Analyze JSON and report:

  1. 🎯 What the agent was trying to do
  2. 🛠️ Which tools were called (in order)
  3. ✅ Tool results (success/failure)
  4. ❌ Error messages (if any)
  5. 💡 Root cause analysis
  6. 🔧 Suggested fix

Example response format:

Deep Dive Analysis - Trace abc123

Goal: User asked "Find all projects in Neo4j"

Execution Flow:
1. ✅ search_nodes(query: "projects")
   → Found 24 nodes

2. ❌ get_node_details(node_id: "proj_123")
   → Error: "Node not found"
   → This is the failure point

3. ⏹️ Execution stopped

Root Cause:
The search_nodes tool returned node IDs that no longer exist in the database,
possibly due to recent deletions.

Suggested Fix:
1. Add error handling in get_node_details tool
2. Filter deleted nodes in search results
3. Update cache invalidation strategy

Token Usage: 1,842 tokens ($0.0276)
Execution Time: 8.7 seconds

Workflow 3: Export Debug Session

When user says: "Save this session" or "Export traces"

Execute:

# Create session folder with timestamp SESSION_DIR="langsmith-debug/session-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)" mkdir -p "$SESSION_DIR" # Export traces langsmith-fetch traces "$SESSION_DIR/traces" --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata # Export threads (conversations) langsmith-fetch threads "$SESSION_DIR/threads" --limit 20

Report:

✅ Session exported successfully!

Location: langsmith-debug/session-20251224-143022/
- Traces: 42 files
- Threads: 8 files

You can now:
1. Review individual trace files
2. Share folder with team
3. Analyze with external tools
4. Archive for future reference

Session size: 2.3 MB

Workflow 4: Error Detection

When user asks: "Show me errors" or "What's failing?"

Execute:

# Fetch recent traces langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --format json > recent-traces.json # Search for errors grep -i "error\|failed\|exception" recent-traces.json

Analyze and report:

  1. 📊 Total errors found
  2. ❌ Error types and frequency
  3. 🕐 When errors occurred
  4. 🎯 Which agents/tools failed
  5. 💡 Common patterns

Example response format:

Error Analysis - Last 30 Minutes

Total Traces: 50
Failed Traces: 7 (14% failure rate)

Error Breakdown:
1. Neo4j Connection Timeout (4 occurrences)
   - Agent: cypher
   - Tool: search_nodes
   - First occurred: 14:32
   - Last occurred: 14:45
   - Pattern: Happens during peak load

2. Memory Store Failed (2 occurrences)
   - Agent: memento
   - Tool: store_memory
   - Error: "Pinecone rate limit exceeded"
   - Occurred: 14:38, 14:41

3. Tool Not Found (1 occurrence)
   - Agent: sqlcrm
   - Attempted tool: "export_report" (doesn't exist)
   - Occurred: 14:35

💡 Recommendations:
1. Add retry logic for Neo4j timeouts
2. Implement rate limiting for Pinecone
3. Fix sqlcrm tool configuration

Common Use Cases

Use Case 1: "Agent Not Responding"

User says: "My agent isn't doing anything"

Steps:

  1. Check if traces exist:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5
  2. If NO traces found:

    • Tracing might be disabled
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true in environment
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_API_KEY is set
    • Verify agent actually ran
  3. If traces found:

    • Review for errors
    • Check execution time (hanging?)
    • Verify tool calls completed

Use Case 2: "Wrong Tool Called"

User says: "Why did it use the wrong tool?"

Steps:

  1. Get the specific trace
  2. Review available tools at execution time
  3. Check agent's reasoning for tool selection
  4. Examine tool descriptions/instructions
  5. Suggest prompt or tool config improvements

Use Case 3: "Memory Not Working"

User says: "Agent doesn't remember things"

Steps:

  1. Search for memory operations:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 20 --format raw | grep -i "memory\|recall\|store"
  2. Check:

    • Were memory tools called?
    • Did recall return results?
    • Were memories actually stored?
    • Are retrieved memories being used?

Use Case 4: "Performance Issues"

User says: "Agent is too slow"

Steps:

  1. Export with metadata:

    langsmith-fetch traces ./perf-analysis --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata
  2. Analyze:

    • Execution time per trace
    • Tool call latencies
    • Token usage (context size)
    • Number of iterations
    • Slowest operations
  3. Identify bottlenecks and suggest optimizations


Output Format Guide

Pretty Format (Default)

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format pretty

Use for: Quick visual inspection, showing to users

JSON Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format json

Use for: Detailed analysis, syntax-highlighted review

Raw Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format raw

Use for: Piping to other commands, automation


Advanced Features

Time-Based Filtering

# After specific timestamp langsmith-fetch traces --after "2025-12-24T13:00:00Z" --limit 20 # Last N minutes (most common) langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 60 --limit 100

Include Metadata

# Get extra context langsmith-fetch traces --limit 10 --include-metadata # Metadata includes: agent type, model, tags, environment

Concurrent Fetching (Faster)

# Speed up large exports langsmith-fetch traces ./output --limit 100 --concurrent 10

Troubleshooting

"No traces found matching criteria"

Possible causes:

  1. No agent activity in the timeframe
  2. Tracing is disabled
  3. Wrong project name
  4. API key issues

Solutions:

# 1. Try longer timeframe langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 1440 --limit 50 # 2. Check environment echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT # 3. Try fetching threads instead langsmith-fetch threads --limit 10 # 4. Verify tracing is enabled in your code # Check for: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true

"Project not found"

Solution:

# View current config langsmith-fetch config show # Set correct project export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="correct-project-name" # Or configure permanently langsmith-fetch config set project "your-project-name"

Environment variables not persisting

Solution:

# Add to shell config file (~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc) echo 'export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_key"' >> ~/.bashrc echo 'export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project"' >> ~/.bashrc # Reload shell config source ~/.bashrc

Best Practices

1. Regular Health Checks

# Quick check after making changes langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5

2. Organized Storage

langsmith-debug/
├── sessions/
│   ├── 2025-12-24/
│   └── 2025-12-25/
├── error-cases/
└── performance-tests/

3. Document Findings

When you find bugs:

  1. Export the problematic trace
  2. Save to error-cases/ folder
  3. Note what went wrong in a README
  4. Share trace ID with team

4. Integration with Development

# Before committing code langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 5 # If errors found langsmith-fetch trace <error-id> --format json > pre-commit-error.json

Quick Reference

# Most common commands # Quick debug langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty # Specific trace langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format pretty # Export session langsmith-fetch traces ./debug-session --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 # Find errors langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --format raw | grep -i error # With metadata langsmith-fetch traces --limit 10 --include-metadata

Resources

  • **LangSmith
五维分析
清晰度9/10
创新性7/10
实用性9/10
完整性10/10
可维护性8/10
优缺点分析

优点

  • 提供来自生产环境轨迹的直接、可操作的见解。
  • 为常见调试场景提供结构化工作流。
  • 支持导出和自动化,便于团队协作。

缺点

  • 其效用完全依赖于 LangSmith 集成是否已启用。
  • 在原生 LangSmith API 之上增加了一层抽象。
  • 主要是用于调试的被动反应,而非用于开发的主动工具。

相关技能

mcp-builder

S
toolCode Lib / 代码库
90/ 100

“这份指南详尽到可能教会 AI 自己编写 MCP 服务器,从而让你失业。”

learn-claude-code

A
toolCode Lib / 代码库
88/ 100

“一个终于承认自己过去错误的教程比大多数都诚实,但仍然忍不住使用经典的'一个奇怪循环'过度简化。”

connect

A
toolAuto-Pilot / 全自动
86/ 100

“这是终极的'我来替你干'技能,把 Claude 从一个深思熟虑的顾问变成了一个能访问你所有账户的、过度热切的实习生。”

免责声明:本内容来源于 GitHub 开源项目,仅供展示和评分分析使用。

版权归原作者所有 ComposioHQ.