Co-Pilot / 辅助式
更新于 a month ago

web-perf

Ccloudflare
0.1k
cloudflare/skills/web-perf
88
Agent 评分

💡 摘要

一款利用 Chrome DevTools MCP 进行核心网页指标、网络请求、无障碍功能和代码库优化的综合性网页性能审计技能。

🎯 适合人群

前端开发工程师性能优化工程师DevOps/站点可靠性工程师质量保证/测试工程师产品经理

🤖 AI 吐槽:This skill is so thorough it might start charging consulting fees after the audit.

安全分析低风险

风险:通过 MCP 配置执行任意本地命令(npx)。缓解措施:沙盒化 MCP 服务器的执行环境,审计 chrome-devtools-mcp npm 包的供应链风险,并限制服务器仅能访问目标域名的网络。


name: web-perf description: Analyzes web performance using Chrome DevTools MCP. Measures Core Web Vitals (FCP, LCP, TBT, CLS, Speed Index), identifies render-blocking resources, network dependency chains, layout shifts, caching issues, and accessibility gaps. Use when asked to audit, profile, debug, or optimize page load performance, Lighthouse scores, or site speed.

Web Performance Audit

Audit web page performance using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. This skill focuses on Core Web Vitals, network optimization, and high-level accessibility gaps.

FIRST: Verify MCP Tools Available

Run this before starting. Try calling navigate_page or performance_start_trace. If unavailable, STOP—the chrome-devtools MCP server isn't configured.

Ask the user to add this to their MCP config:

"chrome-devtools": { "type": "local", "command": ["npx", "-y", "chrome-devtools-mcp@latest"] }

Key Guidelines

  • Be assertive: Verify claims by checking network requests, DOM, or codebase—then state findings definitively.
  • Verify before recommending: Confirm something is unused before suggesting removal.
  • Quantify impact: Use estimated savings from insights. Don't prioritize changes with 0ms impact.
  • Skip non-issues: If render-blocking resources have 0ms estimated impact, note but don't recommend action.
  • Be specific: Say "compress hero.png (450KB) to WebP" not "optimize images".
  • Prioritize ruthlessly: A site with 200ms LCP and 0 CLS is already excellent—say so.

Quick Reference

| Task | Tool Call | |------|-----------| | Load page | navigate_page(url: "...") | | Start trace | performance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true) | | Analyze insight | performance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "...", insightName: "...") | | List requests | list_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", ...]) | | Request details | get_network_request(reqid: <id>) | | A11y snapshot | take_snapshot(verbose: true) |

Workflow

Copy this checklist to track progress:

Audit Progress:
- [ ] Phase 1: Performance trace (navigate + record)
- [ ] Phase 2: Core Web Vitals analysis (includes CLS culprits)
- [ ] Phase 3: Network analysis
- [ ] Phase 4: Accessibility snapshot
- [ ] Phase 5: Codebase analysis (skip if third-party site)

Phase 1: Performance Trace

  1. Navigate to the target URL:

    navigate_page(url: "<target-url>")
    
  2. Start a performance trace with reload to capture cold-load metrics:

    performance_start_trace(autoStop: true, reload: true)
    
  3. Wait for trace completion, then retrieve results.

Troubleshooting:

  • If trace returns empty or fails, verify the page loaded correctly with navigate_page first
  • If insight names don't match, inspect the trace response to list available insights

Phase 2: Core Web Vitals Analysis

Use performance_analyze_insight to extract key metrics.

Note: Insight names may vary across Chrome DevTools versions. If an insight name doesn't work, check the insightSetId from the trace response to discover available insights.

Common insight names:

| Metric | Insight Name | What to Look For | |--------|--------------|------------------| | LCP | LCPBreakdown | Time to largest contentful paint; breakdown of TTFB, resource load, render delay | | CLS | CLSCulprits | Elements causing layout shifts (images without dimensions, injected content, font swaps) | | Render Blocking | RenderBlocking | CSS/JS blocking first paint | | Document Latency | DocumentLatency | Server response time issues | | Network Dependencies | NetworkRequestsDepGraph | Request chains delaying critical resources |

Example:

performance_analyze_insight(insightSetId: "<id-from-trace>", insightName: "LCPBreakdown")

Key thresholds (good/needs-improvement/poor):

  • TTFB: < 800ms / < 1.8s / > 1.8s
  • FCP: < 1.8s / < 3s / > 3s
  • LCP: < 2.5s / < 4s / > 4s
  • INP: < 200ms / < 500ms / > 500ms
  • TBT: < 200ms / < 600ms / > 600ms
  • CLS: < 0.1 / < 0.25 / > 0.25
  • Speed Index: < 3.4s / < 5.8s / > 5.8s

Phase 3: Network Analysis

List all network requests to identify optimization opportunities:

list_network_requests(resourceTypes: ["Script", "Stylesheet", "Document", "Font", "Image"])

Look for:

  1. Render-blocking resources: JS/CSS in <head> without async/defer/media attributes
  2. Network chains: Resources discovered late because they depend on other resources loading first (e.g., CSS imports, JS-loaded fonts)
  3. Missing preloads: Critical resources (fonts, hero images, key scripts) not preloaded
  4. Caching issues: Missing or weak Cache-Control, ETag, or Last-Modified headers
  5. Large payloads: Uncompressed or oversized JS/CSS bundles
  6. Unused preconnects: If flagged, verify by checking if ANY requests went to that origin. If zero requests, it's definitively unused—recommend removal. If requests exist but loaded late, the preconnect may still be valuable.

For detailed request info:

get_network_request(reqid: <id>)

Phase 4: Accessibility Snapshot

Take an accessibility tree snapshot:

take_snapshot(verbose: true)

Flag high-level gaps:

  • Missing or duplicate ARIA IDs
  • Elements with poor contrast ratios (check against WCAG AA: 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text)
  • Focus traps or missing focus indicators
  • Interactive elements without accessible names

Phase 5: Codebase Analysis

Skip if auditing a third-party site without codebase access.

Analyze the codebase to understand where improvements can be made.

Detect Framework & Bundler

Search for configuration files to identify the stack:

| Tool | Config Files | |------|--------------| | Webpack | webpack.config.js, webpack.*.js | | Vite | vite.config.js, vite.config.ts | | Rollup | rollup.config.js, rollup.config.mjs | | esbuild | esbuild.config.js, build scripts with esbuild | | Parcel | .parcelrc, package.json (parcel field) | | Next.js | next.config.js, next.config.mjs | | Nuxt | nuxt.config.js, nuxt.config.ts | | SvelteKit | svelte.config.js | | Astro | astro.config.mjs |

Also check package.json for framework dependencies and build scripts.

Tree-Shaking & Dead Code

  • Webpack: Check for mode: 'production', sideEffects in package.json, usedExports optimization
  • Vite/Rollup: Tree-shaking enabled by default; check for treeshake options
  • Look for: Barrel files (index.js re-exports), large utility libraries imported wholesale (lodash, moment)

Unused JS/CSS

  • Check for CSS-in-JS vs. static CSS extraction
  • Look for PurgeCSS/UnCSS configuration (Tailwind's content config)
  • Identify dynamic imports vs. eager loading

Polyfills

  • Check for @babel/preset-env targets and useBuiltIns setting
  • Look for core-js imports (often oversized)
  • Check browserslist config for overly broad targeting

Compression & Minification

  • Check for terser, esbuild, or swc minification
  • Look for gzip/brotli compression in build output or server config
  • Check for source maps in production builds (should be external or disabled)

Output Format

Present findings as:

  1. Core Web Vitals Summary - Table with metric, value, and rating (good/needs-improvement/poor)
  2. Top Issues - Prioritized list of problems with estimated impact (high/medium/low)
  3. Recommendations - Specific, actionable fixes with code snippets or config changes
  4. Codebase Findings - Framework/bundler detected, optimization opportunities (omit if no codebase access)
五维分析
清晰度9/10
创新性7/10
实用性10/10
完整性10/10
可维护性8/10
优缺点分析

优点

  • 提供极其详细且可操作的工作流程
  • 涵盖性能、网络、无障碍和代码分析
  • 提供具体的阈值和工具调用示例

缺点

  • 严重依赖外部 Chrome DevTools MCP 服务器的稳定性
  • 对非技术用户设置复杂
  • 洞察名称可能因 Chrome 版本而异

相关技能

tldraw

A
toolCode Lib / 代码库
86/ 100

“一个出色的绘图库,不过其许可模式意味着你的杰作将永远带有'Made with tldraw'签名,除非你支付赎金。”

vue-expert

A
toolCo-Pilot / 辅助式
86/ 100

“看起来很能打,但别让配置把人劝退。”

react-expert

A
toolCo-Pilot / 辅助式
86/ 100

“看起来很能打,但别让配置把人劝退。”

免责声明:本内容来源于 GitHub 开源项目,仅供展示和评分分析使用。

版权归原作者所有 cloudflare.